Question 1 answers in Question 1 in marking scheme in link
below
Question 2 answers in question 2 in the marking scheme below
Question 3 answers in question 2 in the marking scheme below
Name
the Government /Organization / Institution
|
Name
of the E-voting System
|
Outline
the advantages and disadvantages of the System
|
Common
Terms and concepts used in its development and application
|
Common
Social and ethical issues stated or implied.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Criterion E: Product development |
Tick |
The different techniques used to
develop the product have been identified.
|
|
The product includes at least three
complex techniques identified in criterion D.
|
|
The appropriateness of the product
structure has been justified.
|
|
Screenshots along with justifications
have been used to illustrate the choice of the techniques used to develop the
product.
|
|
All sources have been cited using an
appropriate referencing style (APA).
|
|
The technical documentation is
approximately 1,000 words.
|
Criterion F: Product
evaluation and future product development
|
Tick
|
Feedback
from client
|
|
Appropriate feedback has been
obtained from the client.
|
|
The evidence for the consultation to
obtain feedback from the client has been linked to the cover page.
|
|
Product
evaluation
|
|
The evaluation refers to the
requirement specifications in criterion B and the test plan in criterion D.
|
|
The evaluation explicitly refers to
the feedback obtained from the client.
|
|
Future
product development
|
|
The recommendations are appropriate
to the client for the future development of the product.
|
|
The product evaluation and future
product development is approximately 400 words.
|
Criterion G: Required elements |
Tick |
Evidence of
testing and functionality
|
|
The product has sufficient extent to
enable its effectiveness and functionality to be evaluated.
|
|
The product has been thoroughly
tested in a range of situations to ensure that no tests will fail.
|
|
The tests used to ensure the
functionality correspond to those in the completed test plan.
|
|
Cover page
|
|
The cover page template has been used.
|
|
The student’s details have been added
where appropriate.
|
|
The cover page has been saved in HTM/HTML
format.
|
|
File naming
and folder structures
|
|
One folder called “product” has been
created, which holds the product.
|
|
The product folder structure is
intuitive and allows files to be located easily.
|
|
One folder called “documentation” has
been created, which holds the eight documentation files: there are no other
files or sub-folders within this folder.
|
|
The documentation is easy to navigate
and uses the file names prescribed in the guide.
|
|
All links within the project are
relative.
|
|
There is appropriate use of file
names throughout the project.
|
Final check |
|
The organization of the project
prescribed in the guide has been adhered to.
|
|
The project is no more than 2,000 words.
|
|
The links within the product and
documentation (where appropriate) are relative, allowing portability.
|
|
The project has been tested in more
than one location under different conditions.
|
|
The correct forms have been used for
the cover page, analysis, and project schedule and product design.
|
|
There are no appendices in the
project.
|